Java-Gaming.org Java4K winners: [ by our judges | by the community ]         
Featured games (67)
games approved by the League of Dukes
Games in Showcase (∞)
games submitted by our members



News: Read the Java Gaming Resources, or peek at the official Java tutorials
 
    Home     Help   Search   Login   Register   
Pages: [1]
  Print  
  Performance: How are we addressing this? Who owns?  (Read 787 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Offline gregorypierce

JGO Strike Force
***

Posts: 905


I come upon thee like the blue screen of death....


« on: 2003-09-04 14:38:17 »

Who should we be contacting about performance issues and how should we be contacting them? On Linux and OSX the performance of the binding pales in comparrison to the performance I can get from the Windows implementation and I'm curious to find out why and if there is anyone who is a Sun person responsible for tracking down and eliminating performance problems.

http://www.gregorypierce.com

She builds, she builds oh man
When she links, she links I go crazy
Cause she looks like good code but she's really a hack
I think I'll run upstairs and grab a snack!
Offline Ken Russell

JGO Kernel
*****

Posts: 3446
Medals: 3


Java games rock!


« Reply #1 on: 2003-09-07 00:27:01 »

There is nothing inherent in the JOGL binding that should cause it to be substantially slower on Linux. The JAWT does have some more heavyweight synchronization that appears to be necessary to get proper behavior on X11, but aside from that I have seen some of the demos run at much higher framerates on Linux compared to Windows because Linux doesn't seem to have sync-to-vertical-retrace enabled by default.

The Mac OS X port up until this point has had a workaround for a JAWT bug that has been fixed. The current binaries have had this workaround removed and should be faster. See the forthcoming announcement post about the new binaries for more information.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.081 seconds with 21 queries.