Java-Gaming.org Hi !
Featured games (84)
games approved by the League of Dukes
Games in Showcase (549)
Games in Android Showcase (137)
games submitted by our members
Games in WIP (594)
games currently in development
News: Read the Java Gaming Resources, or peek at the official Java tutorials
 
    Home     Help   Search   Login   Register   
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6
  ignore  |  Print  
  Discuss the future of 4k contest  (Read 27957 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Offline appel

JGO Wizard


Medals: 69
Projects: 4


I always win!


« Posted 2013-08-29 21:46:24 »

When I took over the java 4k contest from woogley I wanted to make it more user friendly and try to attract casual users. That did work for the first couple of years, but things have changed in the technology world with the introduction of smart gadgets, and a general decline of Java on the desktop for a multitude of reasons. Java4k is primarily now a developers attraction for our close knit community.

Java, webstart and applets, simply is out. You cannot expect it to run on a big chunk of desktops, but primarily it does not play on smart gadgets, phones, tablets, pads etc.

So, does our beloved contest stand at some kind of crossroads? Are my concerns unwarranted? Are there new opportunities?

So, this is really a open thread to discuss the contest in the context of this changing environment.

Thanks.

Check out the 4K competition @ www.java4k.com
Check out GAMADU (my own site) @ http://gamadu.com/
Offline Several Kilo-Bytes

Senior Devvie


Medals: 11



« Reply #1 - Posted 2013-08-29 22:36:42 »

You can't use gadgets because every game would play differently on different devices and it would not be fair to judge games based on different feature sets. You might be able to do something with Ouya, since it is specifically designed for games and would have the same feature set for all developers, judges, and players. Everyone would be using the same API. I don't know what the current state of Ouya is though. That may be the contest after the next one.

Javascript games warrant the reputation that is unwarranted for Java outside the browser so they would not be a better alternative. It's marketing...

Edit: Let me state I am not a fan of the idea that a small group of companies should get together in a closed setting and make decisions to push on all downstream users. It is worse that they call it "open source" and "standard", especially when it means closed devices with no interoperability, competition, or opting out for consumers.

Webkit, Android, and Ouya all have these faults. I want my devices to be a person computer no matter what size they are, but the trend is toward the opposite owner-object relationship.
Offline jonjava
« Reply #2 - Posted 2013-08-29 23:23:41 »

I find the 4k contest is a lot akin to the the demoscene subculture. By us - for us kind of thing. Showing off what kind of neat tricks you can pull off with only 4k.

I'm not sure how you define your "casual user", however, to me, a casual would be someone perhaps new to programming who would be interested to see what can be done/learned from by looking at the impressive games (and source codes) made with only 4k of data.

In other words, a casual, I feel, isn't necessarily that much different from those submitting the games themselves.

If by casual you mean people playing farmville on facebook then I'd rather shoot myself.

New opportunities? How do you mean, larger audiences? Hmm. Live Streams? I don't know.

Games published by our own members! Check 'em out!
Legends of Yore - The Casual Retro Roguelike
Offline namrog84

JGO Ninja


Medals: 46
Projects: 4


Keep programming!


« Reply #3 - Posted 2013-08-30 07:21:25 »

As someone who hasn't ever participated in it.  The few times I've tried making a few things. When I was searching for information, such as a decent  starting point template, game loop.  There was a lot of fragmentation and arguments on which one, or quite a few dead links.(Such as I think someone had an online compacter that ran your class through various compression programs in attempt to shrink it, that website is gone now) and while you can still use pack200 and some other things, the information is spread out and is less new user friendly)
In addition to the few resources to help the 'casual' or 'new' user get started at least with some basics.


I think having a more well defined 'new user'/'tutorial'/'how to' wiki/website on some more basics  would help tremendously with attracting new users.  Since some things are handled differently.


Also why are 'applets'  out.  Even though they are less popular and have those silly security popups.  They still function in most places don't they?


Although it would incur a huge 'overhead' to the new user(especially those not familiar with libgdx).  Perhaps allowing libgdx- html5 port to be part of the competition.

Lets say you can only have 4k of source code (not including anything libgdx boilerplate)  and then compile to the GWT-html5 and then it'd make the applet and accessibility a non issue.

"Experience is what you get when you did not get what you wanted"
Offline elamre
« Reply #4 - Posted 2013-08-30 07:50:29 »

applets are sooo out. On some browsers java is even disabled by default because of all the security flaws it has.

My projects:
Tower Defence!]http://www.java-gaming.org/topics/iconified/25690/view.html]Tower Defence! [lll.......] 30%!
Lightsnakerider! [llllll....] 60%!
Offline Grunnt

JGO Kernel


Medals: 95
Projects: 8
Exp: 5 years


Complex != complicated


« Reply #5 - Posted 2013-08-30 07:54:32 »

Some thoughts:

First of all: I learned a lot during the 4K contests. The artificial limit on size is also a very pleasant (and enforceable) limit on how complex you can make the game. Excellent for trying out new concepts or ideas.

However, the 4K game contest in its present form is often more about designing a good compression chain than about creative game design. This makes it less newbie-friendly. Without a good compression chain (which can be pretty hard to do) there is no way to meaningfully compete in the contest. Also, as you say, Java on the web is history since the security debacle of Java browser plugins.

So in its current form I doubt it will really have a fruitful future ahead of it. But I do like the 4K contest a lot. Some ideas I had:
- Disallow compression tools and make the JAR limit 10K (so Java10K). Or 9K if you like so we can make "its over 9000!!!!" jokes.
- Make a wrapper that all players and contestants can use to launch the 4K or 9K/10K games. I made a simple wrapper with integrated JRE for my own 4K games. The wrapper with JRE would be some MB's, but you could add all 4K games made to the wrapper in a single downloadable collection without increasing the download size much. It would not be runnable from the web, but it would be quite easy to use.
- Do an Java/Android contest with a size limit?
EDIT: added:
- A contest based on LWGJL may also be nice, although that would perhaps be more about OpenGL than about Java.

In don't really see how to do a contest about Java on the web (compiling to HTML5/Javascript kind of defeats the point of having a Java contest). However, there may be possibilities on the desktop (download-the-collection style) or on Android.

Offline princec

« JGO Spiffy Duke »


Medals: 452
Projects: 3
Exp: 16 years


Eh? Who? What? ... Me?


« Reply #6 - Posted 2013-08-30 09:09:02 »

hehe... http://www.lwjgl16k.org/

That's as far as it's got so far Smiley

The 4k problem is now a bit of an anachronism. When you could be reasonably sure that at least Java developers would have Java applets available on their machines it sometimes worked ok (and thanks to how shit applets and webstart are, it often didn't anyway, but meh). Nowadays though anyone with any sense has totally disabled Java applets in the browser because of the massive attack surface it presents to sophisticated malware.

So you've got 4kb of useless code that can't actually be run.

Solutions...? Well maybe an actual launcher/browser desktop application would do the job. A self-contained VM installation like the ones we use for our games, which can be used to play all of the 4k entries (and they're so small the entire library of 4k games can be downloaded on the fly at startup). You'd have to get relatively clever with security but other than that, if it's enthusiasts who want to play the games, that's probably the best way to go. It also means that you can settle on a precise JVM version. You could also use the same launcher for a lwjgl16 compo too Smiley

Well, that's my 2p.

Cas Smiley

Offline princec

« JGO Spiffy Duke »


Medals: 452
Projects: 3
Exp: 16 years


Eh? Who? What? ... Me?


« Reply #7 - Posted 2013-08-30 09:16:58 »

Hah just realised Grunnt has the same ideas as me Smiley

Cas Smiley

Offline Grunnt

JGO Kernel


Medals: 95
Projects: 8
Exp: 5 years


Complex != complicated


« Reply #8 - Posted 2013-08-30 09:59:00 »

Hah just realised Grunnt has the same ideas as me Smiley

Cas Smiley

Great idea Grin

Offline Abuse

JGO Knight


Medals: 15


falling into the abyss of reality


« Reply #9 - Posted 2013-08-30 11:52:46 »

I can't deny, I liked the standardisation and accessibility (to non-programmers) that enforcing Applets brought to the competition.

We could always go back to the old ruleset, and use runnable jars; or do browsers block the download and execution of those too?

The idea of a self contained app for presenting and running the library of games initially seems appealing..... But I can't help feeling it'd just be duplicating the function of the website. (but with a higher barrier to entry)

As for accessibility re the compilation tool chain; I agree it's the most esoteric part of building 4k apps, there should definitely be an official all in one ant+eclipse package for developing, building & publishing a skeleton app.
I know there have been valuable contributions from numerous people, but i don't think we've yet had a comprehensive 'does everything' solution.
I'd be willing to polish mine up and post it for review.

:edit:
Just checked, and in Chrome you have fewer (and less verbose) warnings downloading & executing an unsandboxed runnable jar than you do launching an unsigned applet.
That's really quite stupid.

Make Elite IV:Dangerous happen! Pledge your backing at KICKSTARTER here! https://dl.dropbox.com/u/54785909/EliteIVsmaller.png
Games published by our own members! Check 'em out!
Legends of Yore - The Casual Retro Roguelike
Offline princec

« JGO Spiffy Duke »


Medals: 452
Projects: 3
Exp: 16 years


Eh? Who? What? ... Me?


« Reply #10 - Posted 2013-08-30 11:54:49 »

Runnable jars was another dreadful Java mistake. At least, running them without some sort of security sandbox and prompting just like applets. I really think it's a bad idea to encourage it.

Cas Smiley

Online SHC

2: log() expects parameter 1 to be double, string given
File: /home/jgo/public_html/addon_appreciation.php
Line: 191