Java-Gaming.org Hi !
 Featured games (84) games approved by the League of Dukes Games in Showcase (563) Games in Android Showcase (151) games submitted by our members Games in WIP (605) games currently in development
 News: Read the Java Gaming Resources, or peek at the official Java tutorials
Pages: [1]
 ignore  |  Print
 Negative integer division  (Read 3481 times) 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
loom_weaver

JGO Coder

Medals: 17

 « Posted 2011-11-21 00:32:35 »

Here's a puzzler for you.

Given the following coordinates (same for x or y-axis):
 1 `...|-300 ... -201|-200 ... -101|-100 ... -1|0 ... 99|100 ... 199|200 ... 299|...`

Can you come up with a simple function that given an int, returns the anchor point?  The anchor point is the left-hand number in the range and is a multiple of 100.  For example for any value between -200 ... -101 return -200.  For 100 ... 199 return 100.

The biggest problem for me is that integer division of negative values seems to be different from language to language!  (-1 / 100) gives me -1 in python but 0 in Java.

Otherwise I'd use f(x) = x / 100 * 100
Riven
« League of Dukes »

« JGO Overlord »

Medals: 947
Projects: 4
Exp: 16 years

 « Reply #1 - Posted 2011-11-21 00:38:45 »

 1 `return (x - ( x<0 ? 99 : 0 )) / 100 * 100;`

Hi, appreciate more people! Σ ♥ = ¾
Learn how to award medals... and work your way up the social rankings!
SimonH
 « Reply #2 - Posted 2011-11-21 00:55:05 »

Another option would be to limit the play area to +ve coordinates only.
Integer.MAX_VALUE*Integer.MAX_VALUE is a quarter the size but it's still very, very big!

People make games and games make people
theagentd

« JGO Bitwise Duke »

Medals: 409
Projects: 2
Exp: 8 years

 « Reply #3 - Posted 2011-11-21 01:17:13 »

 1 `return (x - ( x<0 ? 99 : 0 )) / 100 * 100;`

... or just
 1 `return (int)Math.floor(x/100.0);`

It might be slower, though, but it's at least more readable.

Myomyomyo.
counterp

Senior Devvie

Medals: 11

 « Reply #4 - Posted 2011-11-21 02:00:02 »

 1  2  3 `   public static final int anchor(int in) {      return (in / 100 + (in >> 31)) * 100;   }`

or

 1  2  3 `   public static final int anchor(int in) {      return (in / 100 - (in >>> 31)) * 100;   }`

depending on if you want -100 to be -200 or -100
Riven
« League of Dukes »

« JGO Overlord »

Medals: 947
Projects: 4
Exp: 16 years

 « Reply #5 - Posted 2011-11-21 02:18:31 »

 1  2  3 `   public static final int anchor(int in) {      return (in / 100 + (in >> 31)) * 100;   }`

or

 1  2  3 `   public static final int anchor(int in) {      return (in / 100 - (in >>> 31)) * 100;   }`

depending on if you want -100 to be -200 or -100
both these examples are incorrect (partly because they are identical), loom_weaver is very clear about the spec. you're off by one for all negative multiples of 100. there is a reason i used 99 as opposed to 100 in my solution. both -1 and -100 should result in -100.

Hi, appreciate more people! Σ ♥ = ¾
Learn how to award medals... and work your way up the social rankings!
loom_weaver

JGO Coder

Medals: 17

 « Reply #6 - Posted 2011-11-21 02:36:40 »

 1 `return (x - ( x<0 ? 99 : 0 )) / 100 * 100;`

f(-250) = -400.  Should be -300.

I think this is the best I can do.  I was hoping for a non-branching version:

 1  2  3  4  5  6  7 `int anchor(int x) {    if (x < 0) {        return -((-x + 99) / 100 * 100)    } else {        return x / 100 * 100    }}`
Riven
« League of Dukes »

« JGO Overlord »

Medals: 947
Projects: 4
Exp: 16 years

 « Reply #7 - Posted 2011-11-21 02:42:12 »

 1 `return (x - ( x<0 ? 99 : 0 )) / 100 * 100;`

f(-250) = -400.  Should be -300.
I don't know how you tested that, but it simply returns -300, as it should.

 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 `   public static final int anchor(int x)   {      return (x - ( x<0 ? 99 : 0 )) / 100 * 100;   }   public static void main(String[] args)   {      System.out.println(anchor(-250)); // "-300"   }`

Hi, appreciate more people! Σ ♥ = ¾
Learn how to award medals... and work your way up the social rankings!
loom_weaver

JGO Coder

Medals: 17

 « Reply #8 - Posted 2011-11-21 02:54:41 »

 1 `return (x - ( x<0 ? 99 : 0 )) / 100 * 100;`

f(-250) = -400.  Should be -300.
I don't know how you tested that, but it simply returns -300, as it should.

Oops... was testing in Python again.  Argh.  Oh well my lesson learned is be careful with division involving -ve integers.

In the old C standard it did not define what direction to round to (-ve INFINITY or 0) if dividing with a negative int.  In later standards, it rounds towards zero.

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/828092/python-style-integer-division-modulus-in-c
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/319880/integer-division-rounding-with-negatives-in-c
Riven
« League of Dukes »

« JGO Overlord »

Medals: 947
Projects: 4
Exp: 16 years

 « Reply #9 - Posted 2011-11-21 02:57:02 »

As you were hoping for one, here is a non-branching solution:

 1  2  3  4 `   public static final int anchor(int x)   {      return (x - ((x >>> 31) * 99)) / 100 * 100;   }`

Hi, appreciate more people! Σ ♥ = ¾
Learn how to award medals... and work your way up the social rankings!
Riven
« League of Dukes »

« JGO Overlord »

Medals: 947
Projects: 4
Exp: 16 years

 « Reply #10 - Posted 2011-11-21 02:59:27 »

If you want the offset (relative to your anchor), in a non-branching way:

 1  2  3  4 `   public static final int offset(int x)   {      return (x%100+100)%100;   }`

Hi, appreciate more people! Σ ♥ = ¾
Learn how to award medals... and work your way up the social rankings!
loom_weaver

JGO Coder

Medals: 17

 « Reply #11 - Posted 2011-11-21 03:03:48 »

Dang... taking the high-order bit and multiplying by 99.

Thanks for the formulas guys!
Riven
« League of Dukes »

« JGO Overlord »

Medals: 947
Projects: 4
Exp: 16 years

 « Reply #12 - Posted 2011-11-21 03:06:10 »

it you really want to get it 'fast', you can take out the multiply...
 1 `((x >>> 31) * 99) == ((x >> 31) & 99)`

Hi, appreciate more people! Σ ♥ = ¾
Learn how to award medals... and work your way up the social rankings!
ra4king

JGO Kernel

Medals: 367
Projects: 3
Exp: 5 years

I'm the King!

 « Reply #13 - Posted 2011-11-21 05:40:59 »

 1 `return (x - ( x<0 ? 99 : 0 )) / 100 * 100;`

... or just
 1 `return (int)Math.floor(x/100.0);`

It might be slower, though, but it's at least more readable.

@Riven
That last one returns true or false, not a value. What is its purpose?
Hehe looked at it a bit more and realized that you mean to substitute the right-hand side for the left-hand side. Wow that is quite clever and much much faster!

Pages: [1]
 ignore  |  Print

You cannot reply to this message, because it is very, very old.

 wxwsk8er (49 views) 2015-03-20 15:39:46 Fairy Tailz (42 views) 2015-03-15 21:52:20 Olo (26 views) 2015-03-13 17:51:59 Olo (29 views) 2015-03-13 17:50:51 Olo (33 views) 2015-03-13 17:50:16 Olo (40 views) 2015-03-13 17:47:07 ClaasJG (29 views) 2015-03-10 11:36:42 ClaasJG (37 views) 2015-03-10 11:33:01 Pippogeek (45 views) 2015-03-05 14:36:23 Pippogeek (37 views) 2015-03-05 13:56:12
 LiquidNitrogen 23x BurntPizza 21x KevinWorkman 21x basil_ 21x theagentd 18x Riven 18x EgonOlsen 17x Roquen 14x princec 12x SHC 9x Varkas 9x Slyth2727 9x NegativeZero 9x Ecumene 8x ClaasJG 7x teletubo 7x
 How to: JGO Wikiby Mac702015-02-17 20:56:162D Dynamic Lighting2015-01-01 20:25:42How do I start Java Game Development?by gouessej2014-12-27 19:41:21Resources for WIP gamesby kpars2014-12-18 10:26:14Understanding relations between setOrigin, setScale and setPosition in libGdx2014-10-09 22:35:00Definite guide to supporting multiple device resolutions on Android (2014)2014-10-02 22:36:02List of Learning Resources2014-08-16 10:40:00List of Learning Resources2014-08-05 19:33:27
 java-gaming.org is not responsible for the content posted by its members, including references to external websites, and other references that may or may not have a relation with our primarily gaming and game production oriented community. inquiries and complaints can be sent via email to the info‑account of the company managing the website of java‑gaming.org