g666
|
 |
«
Posted
2005-12-02 15:49:09 » |
|
|
desperately seeking sanity
|
|
|
hvor2
Junior Member 
Beyond mind, there is an awareness...
|
|
«
Reply #1 - Posted
2005-12-02 15:57:24 » |
|
Unfortunatelly, now im at really slow intel graphic comp, so performance is trouble. But, as I can see, idea is pretty original and fresh and game is fun.
|
|
|
|
|
kevglass
|
|
«
Reply #2 - Posted
2005-12-02 15:58:26 » |
|
Could we have a non-full screen version? Bit disturbing at work to have the screen taken over  Looks good though didn't get much change to play. Kev |
|
|
|
Games published by our own members! Check 'em out!
|
|
|
Morre
|
|
«
Reply #3 - Posted
2005-12-02 16:00:46 » |
|
Awesome, didn't try it out for long though, bit busy. Looks really nice.
|
|
|
|
Anon666
Junior Member
aka Abuse/AbU5e/TehJumpingJawa
|
|
«
Reply #4 - Posted
2005-12-02 16:46:51 » |
|
Ran dog slow here =( I think this machine may have an ati card.... (also 2 monitors and Win2000 if that has any impact) The blur looks vaguely familiar  |
|
|
|
|
nonnus29
Senior Member
Giving Java a second chance after ludumdare fiasco
|
|
«
Reply #5 - Posted
2005-12-02 18:51:53 » |
|
Ran fine for me, nice concept. The motion blur is a really nice touch, good job!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alan_W
|
|
«
Reply #6 - Posted
2005-12-02 19:20:55 » |
|
Interesting concept. Love the motion blur... and sound too Maybe there's too many ships though, as it's so busy, I don't really get a feeling of motion around the course. Alan |
Time flies like a bird. Fruit flies like a banana.
|
|
|
Anon666
Junior Member
aka Abuse/AbU5e/TehJumpingJawa
|
|
«
Reply #7 - Posted
2005-12-02 23:42:38 » |
|
Dog slow on my home pc too (around 20-30fps i'd say) - do u not have the transaccel flags set?
Should be getting several 100fps rendering so little.
|
|
|
|
|
|
g666
|
|
«
Reply #8 - Posted
2005-12-02 23:48:13 » |
|
Dog slow on my home pc too (around 20-30fps i'd say) - do u not have the transaccel flags set?
Should be getting several 100fps rendering so little.
The fps is limited with a sleep(1000/28) XD, isnt that smooth enough? The reason that it is slower than that if it is howerver is likely due to the heavy use of transparency. |
desperately seeking sanity
|
|
|
|
swpalmer
|
|
«
Reply #9 - Posted
2005-12-03 06:53:09 » |
|
Very slow... hard to control... likely the two are related.
Speed it up and I think it has potential.
|
|
|
|
Games published by our own members! Check 'em out!
|
|
Vorax
Senior Member Projects: 1
System shutting down in 5..4..3...
|
|
«
Reply #10 - Posted
2005-12-03 07:02:54 » |
|
Definetly a neat idea - but as others have reported, runs very slow. Perhaps it would be faster if it's not full screen.
|
|
|
|
|
g666
|
|
«
Reply #11 - Posted
2005-12-03 17:49:41 » |
|
I have changed it to windowed (not uploaded it tho). but now i find that it runs much faster on 1.5 than 1.4. And using all the flags i know doesnt make any difference either.
|
desperately seeking sanity
|
|
|
|
kappa
|
|
«
Reply #12 - Posted
2005-12-03 19:46:42 » |
|
game looks very good, but speed makes it somewhat very hard to play. maybe setting nodirectdraw might help performance and using lower resolution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
g666
|
|
«
Reply #13 - Posted
2005-12-04 12:08:07 » |
|
I uploaded a new windowed version.
|
desperately seeking sanity
|
|
|
|
jojoh
|
|
«
Reply #14 - Posted
2005-12-07 11:46:27 » |
|
Didn't try the earlier version, but game ran very nice and smooth here (Win XP, Java 1.5). It seemed to be a bit picky on how well you have to hit the marks sometimes though. I tried to grab it with the tail and looked like most of the arrow was over the marker, but it still missed. Didn't stand a chance against computer competitors, even though the controlls were smooth  |
|
|
|
|
Morre
|
|
«
Reply #15 - Posted
2005-12-07 11:52:32 » |
|
I agree. The computer players are very hard to beat, I didn't really stand a chance either. I'm on the same config as jojoh, and it's fairly smooth here as well. Good thing there's now a windowed version, by the way  |
|
|
|
arne
Senior Member
money is the worst drug- we should not let it rule
|
|
«
Reply #16 - Posted
2005-12-10 22:40:28 » |
|
yeah - make the AI more stupid, so it's possible to manage the first level - or is there only one level?
|
|
|
|
|
g666
|
|
«
Reply #17 - Posted
2005-12-11 16:05:30 » |
|
Only one level, i should ad more tho sometime.
|
desperately seeking sanity
|
|
|
|
kappa
|
|
«
Reply #18 - Posted
2005-12-11 16:15:20 » |
|
game much improved since i last played it, its nice and playable now, but either i'm just crap at it or the AI is super good |
|
|
|
|
|
Malohkan
|
|
«
Reply #19 - Posted
2005-12-18 17:10:22 » |
|
Ran perfectly fine for me. I really love the look and the gameplay idea, but I couldn't even keep from getting lapped let alone keep up |
|
|
|
|
