JavaOne

[Herkules]

One member??

SOME members of this forum are listed.
But being listed on a news server that replicated press releases is not really a reason to be proud.....

[larry]

How about hosting a JavaTwo in europe?

all in favour say : "i"
all not in favour say: "j"

if ( i >= j || i < j) {
 javaTwo = new JavaOne("Amsterdam");
}

[jbanes]

Now wait a gosh darn minute here! That code is rigged! Why don't you just post:

1   2   3   4   5   6

boolean weDontCareAboutYourOpinion = true; if(i > j || weDontCareAboutYourOpinion) {     javaTwo = new JavaOne("Amsterdam"); }

Games published by our own members! Check 'em out!

[ryanm]

Or even better, short-circuit the boolean condition and have a JavaTwo here even faster, by at least a couple of nanoseconds...

1   2   3   4   5   6

boolean weDontCareAboutYourOpinion = true; if( weDontCareAboutYourOpinion || i > j) {     javaTwo = new JavaOne("Amsterdam"); }

[jbanes]

Or even better, short-circuit the boolean condition and have a JavaTwo here even faster, by at least a couple of nanoseconds...

It would be faster, but it would prevent the poster from gloating if enough people *do* vote for it. If enough people don't vote for it, then he just says "I don't care. Do it anyway!"

[cfmdobbie]

Um, guys...?

[erikd]

It would be faster,

I think not. I would guess the i > j clause will be optimized out by the compiler either way (probably even the whole if), so they will be equally fast.  

Um, guys...?  

Ahem, (cough) yes
*getting back to work *